Our world revolves heavily around social media. It connects us to the people around us, and to other people across the world. While it may have changed the game in terms of communication, it has also brought in many problems. An example of these problems is a situation in Indonesia, where the government was forced to restrict usage of social media apps like: Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram. The reason for this was because of the spread of hoaxes, and misleading information through social media. This lead to riots which then lead to the death of six people, and left over 200 people injured. The restrictions set only limited the pictures and videos they could post. There would be a delay for each post to confirm that they are not spreading any misleading information that could entice the riots. The tensions are high, and they are making sure that nobody else gets hurt. They did not fully restrict the social media applications because citizens still need to communicate with their love...
I agree with you Janssen, I see no point in burning the nike clothing in protest, these people are burning pre-purchased clothing, not affecting Nike's sales at all. Along with this, the attention and supporters that Nike received due to this commotion have also benefitted Nike's sales. No matter how anyone sees this, Nike has no doubt benefitted significantly. Although we can not know for sure if Nike did this predicting the positive outcome, it is very plausible and a very smart decision. This ad campaign did stir up a lot of controversy, but I can't see this commotion lasting for two more month and it will just be something of the past. I am also amazed by this whole situation as I don't see the point of this protest either.
ReplyDeleteI wholeheartedly agree. I think Nike actually wanted to spread awareness for social injustice. The release of this ad was risky, which you could see from when it first dropped and Nike's stocks went down 4%. Fortunately, they made $6 billion some time after the ad released. They did it because they wanted to show that they care about what's happening, they weren't focused on the profit. I think the way people responded was expected because obviously everyone is going to have different opinions. The public's response doesn't affect me, because I choose to support Nike in this cause.
ReplyDelete~Kevin Ngeleka
DeleteI totally agree. The obvious reason for this is ridiculous, and Nike is not losing anything form it. They profited from the situation, and if you are burning your Nike shoes it will not affect them because you have already gave them your money. Nike promoted the image of Colin, presumably, because it was looking to break into the market and because it was hoping to sell inspiration. Kaepernick created a national firestorm when he began kneeling during the National Anthem in an effort to protest African-American inequality in America. He sacrificed his entire career just to stand for what he believes in.
ReplyDelete